2012 News
This decision comes a year after the International Botanical Congress (IBC) XVIII held in Melbourne, Australia accepted new botanical plant names described in online-only papers. For more information about the amendment see:
Knapp S, McNeill J, Turland NJ. 2011. Changes to publication requirements made at the XVIII International Botanical Congress in Melbourne - what does e-publication mean for you? BMC evolutionary biology 11:250. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/11/250
Miller JS, Funk VA, Wagner WL, Barrie F, Hoch PC, Herendeen P. 2011. Outcomes of the 2011 Botanical Nomenclature Section at the XVIII International Botanical Congress. PhytoKeys 5:1-3. Publisher Full Text
More information at: http://news.sciencemag.org/scienceinsider/2012/11/largest-us-genetic-biobank-revea.html
1. Yang, Chenghai, Everitt, James H., and Goolsby, John A. 2011. Mapping Giant Reed (Arundo donax) Infestations along the Texas–Mexico Portion of the Rio Grande with Aerial Photography. Invasive Plant Science and Management. 4(4): 402-410.
2. Yang, Chenghai, Goolsby, John A., Everitt, James H. 2009. Mapping giant reed with QuickBird imagery in the Mexican portion of the Rio Grande Basin. Journal of Applied Remote Sensing 3(1), 033530.
A collaborative project devoted to educating science and medical librarians on e-Science, the portal was initiated at the University of Massachusetts Medical School through funding from the National Network of Libraries of Medicine. Content for the portal is contributed by a dedicated team of subject specialists from diverse New England research libraries. This team has scoured the web for e-Science news, events, projects, and tutorials.
The e-Science portal is divided into the following key focus areas:
- About e-Science: Overview of e-Science, definitions, data sharing practices of researchers, cyberinfrastructure, policy, open science advocacy
- e-Science and Libraries: ARL reports, library roles, competencies needed by e-Science librarians, librarian education programs, blogs that post about e-Science/open science issues
- Data Support Services: Data management planning guides and resources, funder requirements, data curation, data repositories, science data literacy instruction, and research information networks
- e-Science Community: e-Science Community Blog with news/events/opportunities and commentaries, projects in New England, national projects, links to regional and global organizations
- Science Primers: overviews and tutorials on life sciences, physical sciences, and engineering; Science Boot Camp presentations, research tools
- About the Portal: mission and scope of portal, organization of content, portal staff, advisory, and editorial boards, content contributors, and selection criteria for content
“A detailed review of all 2,047 biomedical and life-science research articles indexed by PubMed as retracted on May 3, 2012 revealed that only 21.3%of retractions were attributable to error. In contrast, 67.4% of retractions were attributable to misconduct, including fraud or suspected fraud (43.4%), duplicate publication (14.2%), and plagiarism (9.8%). Incomplete, uninformative or misleading retraction announcements have led to a previous underestimation of the role of fraud in the ongoing retraction epidemic. The percentage of scientific articles retracted because of fraud has increased ~10-fold since 1975. Retractions exhibit distinctive temporal and geographic patterns that may reveal underlying causes.”
(1) F. Fang et al. “Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Published online before print October 1, 2012, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1212247109
Source: ResourceShelf Blog
For example, Organovo, a company based in San Diego, California, has developed a printer to build 3D tissue structures that could be used to test pharmaceuticals. The most advanced model it has created so far is for fibrosis: an excess of hard fibrous tissue and scarring that arises from interactions between an organ's internal cells and its outer layer. The company's next step will be to test drugs on this system. "It might be the case that 3D printing isn't the only way to do this, but it's a good way," says Keith Murphy, a chemical engineer and chief executive of Organovo.
Read the entire story at: http://www.nature.com/news/science-in-three-dimensions-the-print-revolution-1.10939?WT.ec_id=NATURE-20120705
Source: ResourceBlog of the The ResourceShelf Newsletter
"Epigenomics" http://sis.nlm.nih.gov/enviro/epigenomics.html provides links to resources related to epigenetics and epigenomics, scientific areas focused on changes in the regulation of gene activity and expression which are not dependent on gene sequence.
"Water Pollution" http://sis.nlm.nih.gov/enviro/waterpollution.html directs users to resources on drinking water, water pollution, bottled water, water regulations and standards, disinfection byproducts, and Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products as Pollutants (PPCPs).
These resources provide pre-formulated PubMed and TOXNET searches as well as links to related databases and data repositories.
More information at: http://sla2012.wordpress.com/restaurant-guide
Join us for a full day pre-conference workshop at the 9th Annual Meeting of HTA in Integrated Care for a Patient Centered System Conference, http://www.htai2012.org/
Content: This workshop will focus on advanced information retrieval and management methods to inform health technology assessment and will be composed of four sessions:
Speakers:
• Liz Dennett, Institute of Health Economics
• Dagmara Chojecki, Institute of Health Economics
• David Kaunelis, Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH)
• Catherine Voutier, Melbourne Health
• Sigrid Droste, Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Healthcare (IQWiG)
• Rocío Rodríguez López, Andalusian Agency for Health Technology Assessment (AETSA)
Venue: Euskalduna Conference Centre and Concert Hall, Bilbao, Spain
Date: Sunday June 24th, 2012
Organiser: The Information Resources Group of HTAi
Pre-conference workshops are open both to members and non-members of HTA
COST: 100 Euro before April 30; 110 Euro after April 30
HTAI Member Registration: https://ercisa.eventszone.net/myCongress5/form.php?thisFormCongress=htai2012&thisFormLanguage=en
Non HTAi Members – please email registration@htai2012.com
For more information, please contact Catherine Voutier, HTAi Information Resources Group Chair: catherine.voutier@mh.org.au
Read more at: http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2012/01/13/jstor-opens-limited-free-access-option-non-subscribing-scholars#ixzz1jRdqEyfGInside Higher Ed
"We first used low doses of radiation and recorded images in which the inner structure of the virus was invisible," said Dr. Steven (NIAMS). "Next, we used high doses of radiation, and found that the inner structure could be seen as a cylinder of bubbles." While the inner structure was damaged, the team was able to superimpose the images, using three-dimensional computer reconstruction. As a result, they were able to clearly visualize the viral structure. The investigators call this technique bubblegram imaging.
For more information on the NIAMS Laboratory of Structural Biology Research, visit
http://www.niams.nih.gov/Research/Ongoing_Research/Branch_Lab/Structural_Biology/default.asp.
The html version of this release contains images of a virus and blow-up of inner virus structure at
http://www.niams.nih.gov/News_and_Events/Press_Releases/2012/inner_workings_virus.jpg .
(1) Wu, Weimin, Julie A. Thomas, Naiqian Cheng, Lindsay W. Black, and Alasdair C. Steven. 2012. Bubblegrams Reveal the Inner Body of Bacteriophage. Science 335(6065): 182.
A new analytical tool, called SIIP, from IBM is helping scientists scan patents for information about molecular data and chemical information. SIIP housed in the IBM SmartCloud, processes documents in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, the European Patent Office and the World Intellectual Property Organization, as well as the public domain Relevant Products/Services documents in the U.S. National Library of Medicine's MEDLINE database. SIIP uses image analysis and enhanced optical recognition of chemical images and symbols to quickly obtain the information, a process that otherwise could take months to do manually. SIIP was originally developed for IBM'S own use, and it has been used by hundreds of experts in the company for management and licensing. The company said that many top life-sciences companies also use SIIP because of its special focus on sifting patents for biological and chemical information. SIIP is only available by subscription. IBM Global Business Services also provides consulting services for clients using SIIP. More information about IBM SIIP is available at http://www-935.ibm.com/services/us/gbs/bao/siip/
Because of the value of the retrieved information to the scientific community, IBM has donated to the National Institutes of Health an SIIP-created database of more than 2.5 million unique chemical compounds, along with the references in the literature. The database, extracted from millions of patents and scientific documents, is expected to allow medical researchers to more readily understand relationships between chemical compounds.
Credit: ResourceBlog
Read more at:
http://www.cio-today.com/news/IBM-Tool-Scans-Patents-for-Key-Data/story.xhtml?story_id=13000C0BFI9U&full_skip=1
and
http://www-03.ibm.com/press/us/en/pressrelease/36181.wss
Editor-in-chief Randy Schekman, former editor in-chief of Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, and managing executive editor Mark Patterson, previously the Director of Publishing at PLoS, will be joined by deputy editors, Fiona Watt, currently at the University of Cambridge, UK, and Detlef Weigel from the Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, Tubingen, Germany. They will be supported by around 15-20 senior editors – researchers who represent a broad range of biomedical and life science research fields.
The first issue of eLife is expected late next year. The journal will utilize the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license (CC BY 3.0) so that the content can be shared and used without restriction.
Randy Schekman, a cell biology researcher at the University of California is launching this new open access journal, which is run strictly by active researchers in an attempt to address some of the complaints about scientific publishing. Although there are many specialist journals headed by scientists, the top tier publications are often run by professional editors who do not work in a lab, and who do not moderate the peer-review process. Many researchers have complained that their manuscripts are rejected on the opinion of one reviewer, even when the remaining two reviews are glowing. To stem this problem Schekman plans to have referees discuss their opinions in a private online forum and come to a consensus—a process mediated by the senior editor—ideally within a month of the paper’s submission.
Read more at: http://www.hhmi.org/news/elife20111107.html
and
http://wellcometrust.wordpress.com/2011/11/07/elife-a-journal-by-scientists-for-scientists/
Rev. December 2012